Monday 13 August 2007

Being Organised

It took me twenty-one years and privation from family to realise how the martial law employed by mother for my upbringing was a blessing in disguise. Mother's penchant - which sometimes flirted with obsessiveness - for immaculately done bed, sofa and wardrobes never enticed me to the extent it did to her. Nevertheless, in the process, all this was deeply ingrained into the back of mind. Now, in professional life, the Five-S lessons hence sound ridiculous.

However, this is not applicable to each and all. Master, for instance, is an utterly disorganised creature even after hailing from similar bourgeoisie. He is one of those who take the paltry alibi of nature to carpet their laziness. 'Dust is a protective cover,' Master quips every time I point at the tons of dust lying atop the TV, books, pile of newspapers, refrigerator, kitchen platform and utensils. 'Picking and placing things you need, at obscure locations, is a gargantuan futility,' is the repartee when I request to fold the mosquito net in the morning, to hang keys on the stand, place utensils in the cupboards and hanger the clothes in the wardrobes. 'Everything is within the reach of my hands,' comes the reply when I convince him that his condo is more akin to trenching ground and not beautiful.

Thankfully, Master doesn't exist at workplace. The problem, though, persists. Most of the colleagues find themselves surprised when they are unable to locate the document kept 'right here.' Each one has six drawers - four small and two big - and full full almirah to keep documents. Given that, the supply of folders and files is unlimited. Inside their PCs, the 80 GB hard drive is stuffed till the brink with documents, songs, videos and all. To use folders to segregate irrelevant documents is, however, Greek to most. When boss demands a file, most fumble with the OS search feature, which shows more irrelevant thing than relevant.

Being organised is not being pedantic. It's being efficient and at the same time, elegant too. The difference lies in the activity one does to get the work done. Are you finding or searching, is all what matters. Time invested in organising room is well encashed with a single compliment. Time is precious. Those who value it, seek for efficiency. Others, who have no qualms in wasting it, a la Master, tag efficiency as unnecessary overhead and elegance as needless extravaganza. Long back, while learning databases, I came across a conclusive statement: 'The time spent in storing the info in organised fashion is paid off handsomely, when the lookup time is insignificantly negligible.'

Alas! Not many read databases. Not many of those read, do it for understanding. And a little of those who understand, are agile enough to implement it (read Master).

Being organised is not in many peoples' capacity. Hence proved.

Honour

Lately, we come across multitude of incidents that we label inconceivable, inhuman or even savage. A reason for such incidents coming to light is deeper penetration of media in our lives, thanks to the improvement in technology. Media, purportedly the fourth pillar of democracy - unfortunately infested with most inane variety of humans - has coined a term for the genre of such incidents: Honour Killing.

From pristine ages till date, our society is plagued with this bug of honour. The पांडव ruined their entire youth for the name sake of क्षत्रीय honour. Today, we go gaga over the men in armed forces, for they protect the honour of the country. Innumerable couples are made victims of inhuman treatment for they act against the hollow honour of family or society.

Strangely though, a common trait can be observed in all such honour deed: an irrational, illogical or hollow act that can't be justified on volition.

पांडव, had they been so great warriors they are portrayed as - for record, none of them killed any significant कुरु general or scion - each one breached the hallowed क्षत्रीय code of conduct. भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य, कर्ण or दुर्योधन, all were killed by deceit or foul, masterminded by कृष्ण. व्यास reconciles on this later, in the very epic, stating, 'अधर्म brews अधर्म.' In turn accepting, that illogical decisions -taken or accorded to- for stake of honor leads to ruin.

Inordinate amount of hype is attached to armed forces; domestically as well as worldwide. Speak a little against (read truth) them and every Tom, Dick and Harry's head spins topsy turvy. Everyone gets into a dialectic of how we are safe and sound for someone is guarding the fences when we are sleeping tight. We are hence indebted and since we can't offer anything else, we offer our honour. But I pay taxes to the government who makes their salary cheques! Once discussing the same with a close acquaintance, who hails from army background, I got a surprising repartee. She said, 'Ask me. I know. War is such a waste! It doesn't kill humans. It murders humane. It's so tragic to admit that we kills others to live.' She further added that the postings are harsh and surviving such arduous circumstance is but laudable. I agreed in toto. Armed forces are necessary evil, for fanatics are incorrigible. The men must be respected, undoubtedly, yet, at par with other citizens engaged in other productive enterprises. Many people die while building roads, bridges, dams, power plants and similar infrastructure which touches - though much pronouncedly - to more lives. The poor souls never garner notice because it didn't die of some silly bullet or a worthless jet. Is their life insignificant just because of this?

Regarding honour killing, it reminds me of the uncivilised tribal instincts, where the decision of mass rules over he decision of the class. Ancient scriptures, though religiously followed & adhered by such, have failed to imbibe pragmatism in the followers, ironically, which they were meant for.

Honour and Logic, unfortunately, can't coexist.